Advanced Prompt Chaining
Build LLM Workflows

Visually create prompt chains using our workflow builder. Collaborate, version, test and deploy visually via the dashboard.

Request a demoStart for free 🍰

Prompt Workflows Visualized

Version Control

Version your workflows and maintain a history of changes as you iterate.

Interactive Playground

Easily test your worfklows with the interactive worfklow playground, start or stop from any node.

A/B Testing

Conduct A/B tests based on user segments to optimize workflow performance.

Release Labels

Manage environments like production and development through the dashboard without code changes

Parallelized Execution

Workflows are automatically parallelized on PromptLayer delivering performance improvements.

Compare Chains

Analyze the performance of simple and complex prompt chains.

Version and test prompt chains
Collaboratively

Design your LLM architectures without having to code or waste engineering cycles. Move quickly and adapt to changing best practices with ease.

no-img

Test LLM Architecture

Iterate and version different prompt chain permutations.

Mix & Match Models

Achieve the best results by using different models like GPT and Claude together in your workflow.

Visualize Data Flow

Step through data flow and debug bottlenecks with our prompt GUI visualizer.

Team Collaboration

Build workflows together with engineers, PMs, and the non-technical stakeholders on your team.

Frequently asked questions

If you still have questions feel free to contact us at sales@promptlayer.com

How should teams manage prompt chains, test prompt variations, and measure performance at scale?
As prompt chains grow more complex, failures often emerge from interactions between steps rather than individual prompts. Teams manage this by testing chains end-to-end on representative datasets and evaluating overall outcomes. In practice, this is enabled through a prompt management platform that supports workflow orchestration, step-level tracing, and evaluation, allowing teams to perform root-cause analysis and tune performance at scale.
How do we handle branching logic and conditional paths inside chains?
Branching logic becomes risky when prompt chains rely on intermediate outputs to control downstream behavior. Teams address this by defining explicit conditional paths and treating routing as part of the workflow itself. Tracing intermediate inputs and outputs makes it clear which path executed, enabling root-cause analysis and performance tuning as chains grow more complex.
How do we manage state across multi-step chains without hallucination drift?
Teams manage state across multi-step chains by explicitly controlling what context persists between steps. Rather than passing full histories forward, they summarize or selectively propagate only relevant intermediate outputs. This scoped context management keeps chains within reliable context limits, reduces token usage, and prevents hallucination drift as workflows become longer and more complex.
How do we support multi-model chains?
Supporting multi-model chains requires separating workflow logic from individual model integrations. Teams typically use a prompt management platform to abstract the LLM API layer, allowing different steps to call different models based on cost, latency, or quality needs. This enables flexible optimization without hard-coding provider choices into the workflow.
How do we design chains so they are modular, reusable, and composable?
Chains become hard to maintain when prompt logic is duplicated across workflows.Teams design modular chains by treating prompts and sub-workflows as reusable, versioned components or snippets. This allows larger workflows to be composed from tested building blocks, making changes safer and ensuring consistent behavior across applications as systems scale.